Original Message Date: 11 Aug 92  01:38:03
From: Dick Gladden on 1:381/5
To: Tom Jennings on 1:125/111
Subj: Reply to "paper" letter
^AINTL 1:125/111 1:381/5
Last things first... Lisa Gronke. I think she'd be a good choice. Have 
read some of her stuff and she seems to be level-headed. Downside: 
Editorship has tangible benefits. About 4 weeks ago a certain editor 
stated he was terribly handicapped by having to use an obsolete RS 
computer. Presto... no more handicap. The pen is mightier than the sword 
or maybe even dough-re-mi. :-)

Fido docs: Scratch publishing 'em... just provide something on disk we can 
dump to prn. Seems to me you'll still earn income from Fido as a shareware 
project. I keep getting inquiries about 12u but can only offer handholding 
without some paper.

Support shareware users ONLY in FIDO echo. There's a ton of experience 
available there. For those few Fido/FidoNet users lacking access to FIDO, 
give 'em a mailing address/phone number (with permission) of someone like 
Ken or Ray. I don't see a need for you to make regular appearances in FIDO 
considering the depth of expertise available.

Privacy act: Go get 'em. The Feds proposal to require data transmission 
technology be restricted, just so they can eavesdrop without being 
inconvenienced, is very disturbing. The hell with 'em. There's too much 
snooping going on as it is without impairing future technological 
development.

I was watching Computer Chronicles demonstrate a new graphics 
breakthrough.... gonna to have trouble describing it. Suffice to say 
programmers are able to generate life-like images in real-time motion for 
video. One would have sworn they were actually watching people in action.

Afterwards the thought occured to me that the Feds pornographic review 
board (wherever that is) would be hard pressed to make a case against 
someone producing, mailing, transmitting, whatever, electronically created 
images that, if containing real people, would otherwise be prohibited. 
Should be interesting to see how lawmakers react. I think this is the same 
technology used in the new Meyrl Streep film, critiqued recently on TV, in 
which her head rotates completely around on her body... positively weird 
realism.

Speaking of privacy, I might be able to do something for you in the future 
if only I knew your full name, incl middle initial, and SS number. I won't 
promise anything except to keep such info confidential. You can tell me to 
get lost, if you want, and I'll understand.

P.S. FidoTerm. Are you going to release a new version before packing 
everything away or is this a way-down-the-road project?