Date: Fri, 12 Aug 94 13:38:04 EST
Errors-To: Comp-privacy Error Handler <owner-comp-privacy@uwm.edu>
From: Computer Privacy Digest Moderator <comp-privacy@uwm.edu>
To: Comp-privacy@uwm.edu
Subject: Computer Privacy Digest V5#023
Computer Privacy Digest Fri, 12 Aug 94 Volume 5 : Issue: 023
Today's Topics: Moderator: Leonard P. Levine
Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Re: SSN Required by Sprint in U.S.
Re: Towards Natl ID card?
Re: Answering Machine Features
Electronic Cash
Privacy Conference, 9/9/94
CPSR Annual Meeting, Oct 8-9, San Diego
C. P. D. Closed Until 8/22
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Housekeeping information is located at the end of this Digest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dennis G Rears (FSS" <drears@pica.army.mil>
Date: 10 Aug 1994 20:23:28 GMT
Subject: Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Organization: U.S Army ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Wil McCarthy <wmccarth@t4fsa-gw.den.mmc.com> wrote: The clerk was
then forced to ask for my driver's license, and to type in my date
of birth, to prove to the computer that I was old enough to buy
beer. I'm 28 years old and look every day of it, and there was
quite a long line behind me, and the clerk was clearly furious at
having to do this for the nth time on a busy day.
Too bad that didn't happen to me. Perfect situation. Long lines,
ticked off people, and in the middle of checking out. I would have
refused to provide ID. If they refused to sell me the beer, I would
have just walked out leaving everything on the counter. I then would
tell my friends about this and they would do the same.
------------------------------
From: klootzak@stein3.u.washington.edu (Michael Stuyt)
Date: 11 Aug 1994 17:04:48 GMT
Subject: Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Organization: University of Washington
Wil McCarthy <wmccarth@t4fsa-gw.den.mmc.com> wrote: The clerk was
then forced to ask for my driver's license, and to type in my date
of birth, to prove to the computer that I was old enough to buy
beer. I'm 28 years old and look every day of it, and there was
quite a long line behind me, and the clerk was clearly furious at
having to do this for the nth time on a busy day.
I know the new Colorado Licenses have a magstrip on the back. Probably
be at the point where you drag the license through a reader as proof of
age...
--
Michael A. Stuyt<-->finger for public key<----------klootzak@u.washington.edu
Western Hockey League Mailing List POC (whl@u.washington.edu)
:to subscribe email klootzak@u.washington.edu with the subject "WHL SUB"
PGP ver 2.6 fingerprint: BD 47 07 A5 0F CB C8 90 48 CB E7 D8 32 2C 27 AE
------------------------------
From: daved@KaPRE.COM (David Dvorkin)
Date: 11 Aug 1994 18:47:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Organization: KaPRE Software, Inc.
Wil McCarthy <wmccarth@t4fsa-gw.den.mmc.com> wrote: The clerk was
then forced to ask for my driver's license, and to type in my date
of birth, to prove to the computer that I was old enough to buy
beer. I'm 28 years old and look every day of it, and there was
quite a long line behind me, and the clerk was clearly furious at
having to do this for the nth time on a busy day.
No doubt King Soopers wants to protect themselves from any possible
problem with the law. They can point to this procedure as proof that
they couldn't possibly have sold alcohol to someone underaged. Or if
they did, it was the clerk's fault, not the company's.
The chilling effect of what Big Brother might do can be worse than what
BB actually does do. Equally destructive is corporate spinelessness --
easier to institute urine analysis in the workplace or such checks as
the above than to oppose BB.
------------------------------
From: feldman@tis.com (Mark S. Feldman)
Date: 12 Aug 1994 12:45:18 GMT
Subject: Re: Big Brother at Checkout Stand
Organization: Trusted Informations Systems
Wil McCarthy <wmccarth@t4fsa-gw.den.mmc.com> wrote: The clerk was
then forced to ask for my driver's license, and to type in my date
of birth, to prove to the computer that I was old enough to buy
beer. I'm 28 years old and look every day of it, and there was
quite a long line behind me, and the clerk was clearly furious at
having to do this for the nth time on a busy day.
Depending on the jurisdiction, the penalty for selling alcohol to a
minor consistently or even once might be high fines or loss of the
license to sell such beverages. Some jurisdictions might even require
that the age of all purchasers of alcholic beverages be verified and
failing to do so might result in a penalty, even if the purchaser would
otherwise meet the age requirement. One instance of poor judgement on
any clerk's part could cost the store dearly. The store is just trying
to follow the law and stay in business.
------------------------------
From: tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney)
Date: 10 Aug 1994 16:58:17 -0800
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Most groups I've seen over the years that fingerprinted kids gave the
prints back to the parents right then and there --- no copies were EVER
kept. The idea being that the parents should keep a current picture of
their kids, descriptions, and the prints in a safe place in case they
are ever needed. Some of the newer groups have gone to computerized
systems and offer keeping this information on-line for the parents ---
since many parents just don't keep things like fingerprints, pictures,
etc. easily accessible. I don't think there's any ulterior motive in
trying to develop a database of people's prints... but who knows.
As has been noted, fingerprinting will not do anything to prevent an
abduction. What it will do is to allow a positive ID... when the child
is returned or if the child should be found dead (remember, it might be
years before a child is returned and memories might fail... or the
child might be an infant when abducted and kids change a LOT at that
age in a year or two).
One of the worst things to happen to the parents in an abduction case
is NOT KNOWING. The prints are one more way to help gain closure on an
awful situation. It is much much worse to go for years not knowing
what happened than to be able to deal with the grief of knowing for
sure...
--
Glenn Tenney
tenney@netcom.com Amateur radio: AA6ER
(415) 574-3420 Fax: (415) 574-0546
------------------------------
From: pstouffl@dsg.harvard.edu (Paul Stoufflet)
Date: 11 Aug 1994 13:21:58 +0000
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Organization: Decision Systems Group
tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney) wrote:
"Dave Niebuhr" <NIEBUHR@bnlcl6.bnl.gov> wrote: It seems to me
that the first paragraph is the key one in this issue. The
operative word is voluntary and no matter what anyone says,
voluntary means just that -- voluntary.
It would seem that in this case it was voluntary (not that I like
it, but)... if you didn't do it then you would almost certainly not
get the job because the prints were a part of the "evaluation"
process. In other words... the prints were voluntary because you
could choose to apply or not apply for the job --- your choice, no
one is forcing you.
In Texas (and probably other states) you have to be fingerprinted in
order to get a medical license (and you have to have a license in order
to practice medicine). I suppose under Niebuhr's definition this would
be voluntary, I could have just chosen to abandon 4 years of medical
school and tens of thousands of dollars of tuition, not to mention the
future income of a practicing physician.
Just remember, when someone accosts you and says "your money or your
life", at least they are giving you a choice.
--
Paul Stoufflet Social Security: The world's
Decision Systems Group most successful Ponzi scheme.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
75 Francis Street
Boston, MA 02115
internet: pstouffl@dsg.harvard.edu
work: (617) 732-7746
------------------------------
From: O1EVERT@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (Tom Evert)
Date: 11 Aug 94 21:16:53 EDT
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting Rules
Organization: The University of Akron
tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney) wrote:
"Dave Niebuhr" <NIEBUHR@bnlcl6.bnl.gov> wrote: It seems to me
that the first paragraph is the key one in this issue. The
operative word is voluntary and no matter what anyone says,
voluntary means just that -- voluntary.
It would seem that in this case it was voluntary (not that I like
it, but)... if you didn't do it then you would almost certainly not
get the job because the prints were a part of the "evaluation"
process. In other words... the prints were voluntary because you
could choose to apply or not apply for the job --- your choice, no
one is forcing you.
Agreed that you not get the job. The word voluntary has more than one
meaning. Check your IRS booklet - it says we have a 'voluntary' tax
system. How many people do you know chose not to 'volunteer' to pay
their taxes?
BTW - my wife had to be fingerprinted as well as a backround check thru
BCI. Her prints were also on a FBI fingerprint card. She HAD to do
this before she could work in the kitchen at primary, secondary and
high schools in a near-by town. She didn't have a problem with the
process. It's for the 'good' of the kids, I guess.
I still have to wonder what else will be done with her prints (other
than keep them on file). I think they should have been returned to
her.
I choose not to 'volunteer' to pee in a bottle nor do I want to have
this process forced upon me in my present or any future job. The same
is true for fingerprinting. I have nothing to hide and I shouldn't
have to prove it! Guilty until proven innocent doesn't get it.
------------------------------
From: poivre@netcom.com (Poivre)
Date: 10 Aug 1994 22:49:19 GMT
Subject: Re: SSN Required by Sprint in U.S.
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Poivre (poivre@netcom.com) wrote: Sprint really sees nothing as a
privacy issue. First they've got the Friends and Family program
which they use to annoy your friends and family, and now this!
Sprint doesn't seem to know what privacy is, or care. I would
never use Sprint.
Ooops!! Sorry, I got my phone companies mixed up. Thanks to all who
pointed out my error. *blush*
--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
poivre@netcom.com : #include <disclaimer.h>
:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
------------------------------
From: Christopher Zguris <0004854540@mcimail.com>
Date: 10 Aug 94 17:00 EST
Subject: Re: Towards Natl ID card?
This whole arguement about curbing "illegal" employees through smart ID
cards etc. is nonsense. The problem as it currently stands is the
inability of employers to _verify_ the SSN numbers and identity of
current and perspective employees. An employer should be able to
somehow verify -- in real-time -- a SSN to make sure it matches the
name, address etc. on file for the SSN given. A system like VISA and
MASTERCARD use for their merchants would be a good idea, a merchant
calls the issuing bank to verify a suspect charge and the bank verifies
the name and address of the cardholder (the bank doesn't offer any
info, only _verifies_ what the merchant has). I would prefer a system
along these lines instead of a "new" system that forces a universal
card -- think about the costs in dollars and privacy invasion of a
national ID card. A national ID card looks like a new and innovative to
spend _much_ more of our tax dollars _and_ invade our privacy (with the
help of that model of efficiency and privacy -- he said sarcasticly --
the US Postal Service).
------------------------------
From: briang@access.digex.net (Brian G.)
Date: 12 Aug 1994 08:36:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Answering Machine Features
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Poivre <poivre@netcom.com> wrote: I have an answering machine made
by Panasonic and it has that listening feature too. It also has a
button that you can push (this is not a remote feature) to record
the phone conversation you are having. I only discovered these
features upon reading the manual. Its not listed on the box.
Wouldn't you notice the ringing on the phone before the answering
machine picked up the line, or are the machines intelligent enough to
listen for the codes without going 'off-hook'? (Mine is way older than
these ones...it's an 8-track ;-)
------------------------------
From: pgilmart@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Paul Gilmartin)
Date: 11 Aug 1994 01:39:50 -0600
Subject: Electronic Cash
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Andrew Burt (aburt@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu) wrote:
jnash@nyx10.cs.du.edu (John Nash) writes: I'd rather we just
went straight to "cash cards" (still anonymous, as now) --
Australia and many parts of Canada have cash cards - where you
pay shopping bills, gas, etc with your bank card, and it debits
the amount
Ah, but that's the problem -- it's not anonymous. Cash is. I.e.,
I don't have to spread around my credit card# or bank account# for
prying eyes to
The August, 1992 Scientific American contained an article by David
Chaum, "Achieving Electronic Privacy", which proposed a scheme
involving multiple public keys which could issue you a "Magic Cookie",
which could be authenticated, used only once, and not traced. I didn't
understand it, and I'm not sure I believe it. Is the proposal sound?
------------------------------
From: Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.epic.org>
Date: 10 Aug 1994 17:21:49 EST
Subject: Privacy Conference, 9/9/94
Organization: Electronic Privacy Information Center
CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
---------------------------
TECHNOLOGIES OF SURVEILLANCE
TECHNOLOGIES OF PROTECTION
---------------------------
Sponsored by
Privacy International
The University of Eindhoven
The Electronic Privacy Information Center
Friday,September 9, 1994
Nieuws Poort International Press Centre
The Hague, The Netherlands
The conference will bring together experts in law, privacy, human
rights, telecommunications and technology to discuss new technological
developments that affect personal privacy. The sessions will be
interactive, starting with introductions to the subjects by leading
experts, followed by questions and discussion led by the moderators.
8:45 Introduction
Simon Davies, Chairman, Privacy International
9:00 Information Infrastructures
Marc Rotenberg, Electronic Privacy Information Center (US) Stephanie
Perrin, Industry Canada
10:00 Euopean Government Information Sharing Networks
Jos Dumatier, professor of law and director of the Interdisciplinary
Centre for Law and Information Technology (ICRI) at K.U.Leuven
11:00 Cryptography Policy
David Banisar, Electronic Privacy Information Center Jan Smiths,
University of Eindhoven
12:00 Lunch
1:00 Smart Cards and Anonymous Digital Transactions
David Chaum, Digicash
2:00 Wrap up
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration Fees
[] Standard - 220 guilders ($120 US)
[] Non-profit organisations/Educational - 75 guilders ($40 US)
Information
Name: ____________________________________________________________
Organization: ______________________________________________________
Address:_____________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
Phone/Fax:___________________________________________________________
Electronic Mail: ____________________________________________________
Send registration to:
Privacy International
Washington Office
Attn: Conference Registration
666 Pennsylvania Ave, SE, Suite 301
Washington, DC 20003
Make Check/Money Order in US Dollars out to Privacy International
Space is limited, please contact us immediately if you wish to attend!
For more information, contact:
David Banisar
1+202-544-9240(voice)
1+202-547-5482(fax)
banisar@epic.org (email)
------------------------------
From: cpsr-announce@Sunnyside.COM
Date: 11 Aug 1994 11:40:25 -0700
Subject: CPSR Annual Meeting, Oct 8-9, San Diego
**************************
Please distribute and post
**************************
************************************************************************
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
ANNUAL MEETING
October 8 - 9, 1994
University of California, San Diego
Price Center
La Jolla, California, USA
Organizing for Access:
A National Forum on
Computer Networking, Community Action, and Democracy
************************************************************************
In the few short years since the first proposals for a National
Information Infrastructure (NII), a broad social movement has arisen
to put that vision into action in communities across the country.
A remarkable range of people -- educators, librarians, community
activists, computer people, government agencies, advocates for people
with disabilities, and others -- have been using computer networks to
deliver services and to organize themselves behind an emerging agenda
for computing and networking in the public interest. CPSR is convening
this meeting for all people interested in the place of computer
technology in society, with the goal of bringing together a wide range
of voices to discuss the ways in which the NII might serve the needs
of society and to empower one another to pursue shared goals in the
new technological world. Our meeting this year will place particular
emphasis on providing would-be activists with the skills and connections
they need to put the vision of democratic technology into practice.
Saturday, October 8th
8:00 - 9:00 Registration/Coffee
9:00 - 9:15 Welcome to the CPSR Annual Meeting
Phil Agre
9:15 - 10:15 Keynote address
Francois Bar
Department of Communication, UCSD
"Staking Claims to the Network"
This is a critical time for grass-roots involvement in shaping
America's communications networks. National policy-making has
largely deferred issues of encouraging broad access, preventing
network fragmentation, and guaranteeing basic individual rights
and freedoms. Francois Bar argues that broad-based access and
involvement today are critical -- not as charity, but because
the network's future can only be imagined and discovered through
broad-based and sustained experimentation by end-users.
10:15 - 10:45 Break
10:45 - 12:30 Panel Discussion -- Moderated by Steve Miller
"The Meanings of Access"
The theme of "access" has united numerous groups interested in
ensuring equity in the NII. But "access" is a complex concept with
many equally important facets. This panel brings together leading
voices for community access to technology to compare and contrast
the various technical, social, and institutional meanings of access.
Panelists:
Karen Coyle, University of California Library Automation and CPSR-Berkeley
Lee Felsenstein, Interval Research and Berkeley Community Memory
Deborah Kaplan, World Institute on Disability
Larry Shaw, The Exploratorium
Armando Valdez, LatinoNet
12:30 - 2:00 Lunch Break
2:00 - 3:30 Panel Discussion -- Moderated by Kathleen Kells
"Privacy and Intellectual Freedom"
Privacy and intellectual freedom are crucial information rights
shared by all people. Protecting these rights is a full-time job,
one that brings the members of several professions into day-to-day
contact with the the diverse and complicated circumstances in which
real people need to exercise them. This panel features a discussion
among three national leaders in the defense of these rights.
Panelists:
Beth Givens, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, University of San Diego
Judith Krug, Office for Intellectual Freedom, American Library Association
Gary Richwald, Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles
3:30 - 4:00 Break
4:00 - 5:45 Panel Discussion -- Moderated by Rik Belew
"Community Networking in San Diego"
Our host community of San Diego makes a fine "case study" for all of
our meeting's topics. In this panel, five active community members
describe the remarkable range of networking projects going on around
San Diego, placing them in the context of the region's economic and
institutional evolution.
Panelists:
Nell Allen, Department of Social Services, County of San Diego
Marcia Boruta, San Diego Economic Conversion Council
Sandra Hall, Community Activist
Al Rogers, Global SchoolNet Foundation
Mike Stark, San Diego Computer Society
5:45 - 6:00 Closing Remarks -- Judi Clark
************************************************************************
7:00 - 7:30 No Host Bar at Banquet Site
7:30 - 10:30 CPSR Banquet - Fundraiser - UCSD Faculty Club
(Vegetarian food will be available)
* Presentation of the 1993 Norbert Wiener Award
* Banquet Address -- Patricia Glass Schuman, Neal-Schuman Publishers
"Safeguarding the Right to Know"
Patricia Glass Schuman, librarian, businesswoman and activist
for free speech, was 1991-92 president of the American Library
Association (ALA). As ALA President, Schuman launched a series
of "radio rallies" to focus public attention on threats to the
public's Right to Know. Hear her call for information activism
that involves the entire community in strengthening democracy
by defending and expanding everyone's access to information.
************************************************************************
Sunday, October 9th
8:30 - 9:00 Coffee
9:00 - 10:00 Featured speaker
Sonia Jarvis
National Coalition on Black Voter Participation
"The Public-Interest Aspects of the Information Superhighway"
Legislators in Washington are now making policies that will affect
everyone's ability to join in the social and political activities
that make up a democracy. How can we make sure that those who
are not technologically literate will have an opportunity to
participate? Sonia Jarvis will initiate a dialog on strategies
for ensuring that the public interest is given proper consideration.
10:00 - 10:15 Short Break
10:15 - 12:15 Workshops
Now is the time for everyone to become an activist for democratic
uses of information technology. No matter what expertise you have
to offer, or what contribution you'd like to make -- whether it's
running a bulletin board, starting an on-line discussion group for
people with a shared interest, organizing a computer network to
serve your community's needs, helping to protect everyone's privacy
in a world of computer databases, getting new people into the
electronic world, joining the larger public-interest movement, or
drawing on the resources of the net to get people the information
they need to make informed choices in a democracy -- the necessary
skills, tools, and connections are readily available. In these
seven workshops, national experts on technology activism will tell
you how to get started with your own good deeds on Monday morning.
More detailed descriptions of each workshop will be available
sometime in September.
Building Community Networks: Promise and Pitfalls
Aki Namioka and Doug Schuler, Seattle Community Network
Legal Issues for BBS Operators
Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Network-Based Organizing
Dave Banisar, Electronic Privacy Information Center
Steve Miller, Administration and Finance, State of Massachusetts
Helping People and Organizations Get Started With Networking
Eric Theise, Liberty Hill Cyberwerks
Art McGee, Institute for Global Communications
Investigative Reporting on the Internet
Marsha Woodbury, University of Illinois
Paul Lester, California State University, Fullerton
Privacy Activism
Christine Harbs, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, University of San Diego
Dave Redell, CPSR Privacy and Civil Liberties Working Group
Public Interest Activism and the NII Policy Process
Bill Drake, Department of Communication, UC San Diego
12:15 - 1:30 Lunch Break
1:30 - 4:30 CPSR Organizational Discussion
in parallel with informal discussion groups
4:30 - 5:00 Closing Remarks -- Eric Roberts
************************************************************************
ABOUT CPSR
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility is a national,
non-partisan, public-interest organization dedicated to understanding
and directing the impact of computers on society. Decisions regarding
the use of this technology have far-reaching consequences that
necessarily reflect the basic values and priorities of the people who
govern their use.
Founded in 1981, CPSR has 1800 members from all over the United States
and 21 chapters. Each of our members is an important participant in
the dialogue that is helping to shape the future use of computers in the
United States. Our National Advisory Board includes one Nobel laureate
and three winners of the Turing Award, the highest honor in computer
science. CPSR published the influential report "Serving the Community"
on policy issues in the National Information Infrastructure, and is
an active participant in the Telecommunications Policy Roundtable in
Washington.
We believe that as the influence of computers continues to permeate
every aspect of our society, it is important that professionals become
active participants in formulating the policy that governs computer
use and access. CPSR welcomes any and all who share our convictions,
whether they work as computer professionals or not.
For more information, look at the CPSR gopher server, which is located
at gopher.cpsr.org, as well as the new CPSR WorldWide Web pages, whose
URL is http://www.cpsr.org/home. Coming soon in these pages: much more
information about the Annual Meeting.
************************************************************************
Registration Form
Please pre-register as soon as possible to ensure a space at this
exciting meeting. Registrations at the door will be accepted as
space allows. Please send in a separate registration form for each
individual attending the meeting. And please note that the Saturday
night banquet is not included in the price of the meeting.
Name _________________________________________________________________
Address ______________________________________________________________
City _______________________________ State _____________ Zip _________
Telephone __________________________ E-mail_____________________________
CPSR member $55 _______
Postmarked after September 20th $65 _______
Non member $75 _______
Postmarked after September 20th $85 _______
New CPSR membership & registration $95 _______
Postmarked after September 20th $105 _______
Low income $25 _______
Postmarked after September 20th $35 _______
Banquet tickets $40 X ___ = _______
Postmarked after September 20th $45 X ___ = _______
Additional donation to further CPSR's work _______
Total enclosed _______
For more information contact CPSR at (415) 322-3778 or cpsr@cpsr.org.
Send the completed registration form with your check to: CPSR, PO Box
717, Palo Alto, CA 94302.
************************************************************************
--- CPSR ANNOUNCE LIST END ---
------------------------------
From: "Prof. L. P. Levine" <levine@blatz.cs.uwm.edu>
Date: 12 Aug 1994 08:40:31 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: C. P. D. Closed Until 8/22
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
The Computer Privacy Digest will shut down for 1 week while the
moderator takes a trip west. Postings and subscription/unsubscription
requests during this vacation will not be acknowledged until 8/22.
---------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Leonard P. Levine | Moderator of: Computer Privacy Digest
Professor of Computer Science | and comp.society.privacy
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee | Post: comp-privacy@uwm.edu
Box 784, Milwaukee WI 53201 | Information: comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu
| Gopher: gopher.cs.uwm.edu
levine@cs.uwm.edu | Mosaic: gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu
---------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
------------------------------
The Computer Privacy Digest is a forum for discussion on the effect of
technology on privacy or vice versa. The digest is moderated and
gatewayed into the USENET newsgroup comp.society.privacy (Moderated).
Submissions should be sent to comp-privacy@uwm.edu and administrative
requests to comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu.
Back issues are available via anonymous ftp on ftp.cs.uwm.edu
[129.89.9.18]. Login as "ftp" with password "yourid@yoursite". The
archives are in the directory "pub/comp-privacy".
People with gopher capability can access the library at
gopher.cs.uwm.edu.
Mosaic users will find it at gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu.
Archives are also held at ftp.pica.army.mil [129.139.160.133].
End of Computer Privacy Digest V5 #023
******************************
.