Date: Fri, 11 Nov 94 11:42:19 EST
Errors-To: Comp-privacy Error Handler <owner-comp-privacy@uwm.edu>
From: Computer Privacy Digest Moderator <comp-privacy@uwm.edu>
To: Comp-privacy@uwm.edu
Subject: Computer Privacy Digest V5#061
Computer Privacy Digest Fri, 11 Nov 94 Volume 5 : Issue: 061
Today's Topics: Moderator: Leonard P. Levine
Points on Various Topics
Re: Mother's Maiden Name
Re: Snail-mail forwarding
Re: Snail Mail forwarding
Re: Snail-mail forwarding
Clipper Chip information needed
Re: First Amendment Rights vs Regulation of the Net
Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Medical System Security Reply
Re: Sears Captures Signatures
E-mail headers
Re: Other People's E-mail
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
Info on CPD, Contributions, Subscriptions, FTP, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Robert Ellis Smith <0005101719@mcimail.com>
Date: 08 Nov 1994 21:25:03 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Points on Various Topics
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Digital Telephony
In response to Gayle Hodur (Nov. 4), the President signed the Digital
Telephony law Oct. 25.
Mother's Maiden Name
In response to Jim Huggins' comments about mother's maiden name Nov. 3
and subsequent comments: It's important to realize that under a
Federal Trade Commission ruling it is permissible for a credit bureau
to rent, sell or give away a person's mother's m aiden name (along with
phone number, Social Security number and other identifying information)
without any of the protections of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. As
people in the digest have noted, mother's maiden name has traditionally
been a simple and s ecure authenticator, but now that it is so commonly
available commercially, there are no longer any safeguards.
Credit bureaus commonly did not gather this bit of data, but with the
FTC ruling they certainly have an incentive to do so now - and to sell
it to anyone without any need to check out the requester's legitimacy.
Must I Always Carry I.D.?
In response to Mrs. Carey L. Nelson's inquiry Nov. 4 (Is one obligated
to carry personal ID documents?), the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that
it is unconstitutional to require a person to produce personal identity
so long as one's behavior is not illegal . Kolender v. Lawson, 461
U.S. 367 (1983). This information comes from OUR VANISHING PRIVACY, by
Robert Ellis Smith ($16.95 from Privacy Journal, P.O. Box 28577,
Providence RI 02908, 401 274 7861, 0005101719@mcimail.com).
Mike Robkin asked for the best sources on European data protection
(privacy) laws. They are:
Handbook of Personal Data Protection (Stockton Press) by Wayne Madsen,
amends@incomsec.org. It has full texts.
Compendium of European Data Protection Legislation (Intl Business
Action Centre) by G Russell Pipe, in Amsterdam 31 20 673 7311, fax 31
20 675 3827 or in the U.S. 703 323 9116, fax 703 250 4705. It
describes and explains the laws.
Privacy Laws and Business published by Stewart Dresner in Middlesex,
U.K., 81 866 8641, fax 81 868 2915. He has proposed laws as well.
If you need U.S. and Canadian laws, the authoritative source is
Compilation of State and Federal Privacy Laws (1994, 136 pages, $33),
published by Privacy Journal in Providence RI.
0005101719@mcimail.com.
--
From Robert Ellis Smith, Privacy Journal.
------------------------------
From: huggins@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Jim Huggins)
Date: 09 Nov 1994 15:33:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Mother's Maiden Name
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept.
Serrano <poivre@netcom.com> wrote: And don't forget that dishonest
family members who obviously knows one's mother's maiden name can
defraud one real easy, not to mention also snooping on spouse and
children to see their spendings.
Of course, a dishonest family member may also still have physical
access to your house, which would give them all sorts of opportunity
for old-fashioned fraud (stealing the silver, swiping your credit card
out of your pocket, dialing 1-900-SEX-LINE from your phone ...).
It's my understanding that insider fraud is the most difficult type of
fraud to prohibit in most situations. The main alternatives are to
require 'good' passwords (which many people would write down on paper
and keep in their wallet, thus leading back to the original problem) or
to deny phone-based services entirely.
The question is: what kind of threat model are you concerned about?
Mother's maiden name is probably good-enough for the casual thief
who finds your wallet but doesn't know you from Adam. If you want
greater security, you'll need a more complicated authentication scheme.
--
Jim Huggins, Univ. of Michigan huggins@eecs.umich.edu
"You cannot pray to a personal computer no matter how user-friendly it is."
(PGP key available upon request) W. Bingham Hunter
------------------------------
From: cntrspy@ix.netcom.com (Executive Protection Associates)
Date: 09 Nov 1994 19:37:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Snail-mail forwarding
Organization: Netcom
ratner@ficus.CS.UCLA.EDU (Dave Ratner) writes: BUT: the
"forwarding" card to be filled out requires no documentation to
submit, and can even be mailed in to the postmaster of your old zip
(postal) code. So what stops random guy/stalker/person-mad-at-you
from submitting a forwarding address card as you and getting all of
your mail? It would seem the Post Office should require at least a
*little* documentation other than a signature which can't even be
checked against anything.
Absoultely nothing prevents un-authorized use except fear of being
convicted of a US code violation. Check out alt-revenge if you really
want a scare on how this stuff is used.
--
Chris Hall, Chief Operating Officer
Executive Protection Associates, Inc.
Worldwide Investigations, Privacy Protection Consultants,
Second Passport Agents, Off-shore Banking and Trust Agents.
e-mail: cntrspy@ix.netcom.com, cntrspy1@ipn.net *PGP key available.
Opions Expressed are those of the Author and not of EPAI.
WWW Home Page ( http://www.mps.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/hpp?
spook_stuff.html )
------------------------------
From: "Rapisarda, Alessandra" <SB03004@EXCELINK.MARIST.EDU>
Date: 09 Nov 94 15:12:47 EST
Subject: Re: Snail Mail forwarding
Dave Ratner wrote re: snail mail forwarding: BUT: the "forwarding"
card to be filled out requires no documentation to submit
Dave: I agree that this is a suprisingly easy process to complete! I
recently moved my residence and was shocked that I could perform this
action without ever telling anyone that I was really me. Also- the
information goes to the Post Office on a postcard- not a sealed
envelope. I was extremely uncomfortable with this ability. AND- does
anybody know if all the mail from the previous address comes to the new
one? I get all the mail- even mail going to my boyfriend's "ex-".
Amazing how fanatical we can be if someone reads or steals snail mail
(a FEDERAL offense), but anyone can re-direct it to the moon if they
wanted to. I guess if you stop getting snail mail, you know what
happened... See ya.
--
Alex Rapisarda
------------------------------
From: Paul Cook <0003288544@mcimail.com>
Date: 10 Nov 94 13:36 EST
Subject: Re: Snail-mail forwarding
ratner@ficus.CS.UCLA.EDU (Dave Ratner) wrote: BUT: the "forwarding"
card to be filled out requires no documentation to submit, and can
even be mailed in to the postmaster of your old zip (postal) code.
So what stops random guy/stalker/person-mad-at-you from submitting
a forwarding address card as you and getting all of your mail? It
would seem the Post Office should require at least a *little*
documentation other than a signature which can't even be checked
against anything.
It happened to me!
I noticed that my mail delivery was getting erratic. Our postman had
open heart surgery, and we had suffered through a series of substitute
mail carriers, so I thought that this was the cause of the problem. It
seemed like I was only getting a few bulk mail pieces.
Finally I called my local post office to see when my old postman would
be back on the job. He was there when I called, and when I asked about
my mail, he said "I've been forwarding it to Maui just like you
wanted!".
I was incredulous. He went to get the forwarding order, and there it
was with a forged signature, directing all my first class mail and
magazines to General Delivery, Wailuku, HI. The next day he dropped
off a copy of the forwarding order with the forged signature, and I let
the postal inspector know.
I called the Wailuku post office, and asked if they had any mail for
me. The guy who answered the phone said "Yah, Mon...got a BIG pile of
your mail. When you comin' in to pick it up??"
The postal inspector arranged for all the mail to be boxed up and
shipped back overnight at no charge. It was a BIG box of mail. I
caught it just in time so that I didn't have any late unpaid bills.
We never did figure out who did it.
A few years later I had a roommate who was intercepting offers from
credit card companies, filling them out with information he had gleaned
by snooping through my tax returns, and then intercepting the cards
before I saw them. He would run up big charges, which the credit card
companies just wrote off. He never got caught either.
--
Tad Cook tad@ssc.com
------------------------------
From: Shannon Dunn <SHDUNN@NMU.EDU>
Date: 09 Nov 94 15:32:10 EST
Subject: Clipper Chip information needed
My name is Shannon Dunn and I am a junior at Northern Michigan
University. My reason for writing is to request information on the
Clipper Chip issue. Any kind of information reguarding the Clipper
will be a great aid to an ethics paper I am writing concerning this
issue. Thank You.
--
Shannon Dunn
------------------------------
From: gmcgath@condes.mv.com (Gary McGath)
Date: 09 Nov 1994 18:30:37 -0500
Subject: Re: First Amendment Rights vs Regulation of the Net
Organization: Conceptual Design
KL9636A@american.edu (Kevin Levitt) wrote: I am a senior at
American University conducting a research paper on the issue o f
first amendment rights vs. regulation of the net. I am looking for
opinions, articles, papers, and/or references on the subject.
Also, how can the governm ent regulate the net without breaching
our first amendment rights and should th e net be regulated at
all? Thanks for your help!
I recommend Jonathan Emord's *Freedom, Privacy, and the First
Amendment*, Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, 1991.
--
gmcgath@condes.mv.com
"Do not beg for alms from those who have robbed you." -- Ayn Rand
------------------------------
From: mcinnis@austin.ibm.com (Mickey McInnis)
Date: 09 Nov 1994 20:12:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Organization: IBM Austin
centauri@crl.com (Charles Rutledge) writes: Not true. The Supreme
Court ruled sometime back that you are not legally bound to carry
identification nor identify yourself to law enforcement officals
unless they have suspession that you are doing something illegal.
The case delt with a black man walking at night throught a mostly
white neighborhood and stopped by people and asked to identify
himself. When he couldn't (he was not carrying any identification
at the time), they arrested him for basicly having no ID. In the
ruling, the Supreme Court said that law enforcement officials have
no right to demand ID from someone just minding his own business.
Of course, law enforcement officials often have a very liberal
interpretation of what minding one's own business is.
The police can charge you with a minor offence such as jaywalking,
etc. and hold you in jail until you produce ID or go to trial. (or
appear before a judge, etc.)
i.e. they can hold you in jail for an offense that you would normally
get a ticket for if you don't produce "adequate" ID. This happened in
Denver some years back to someone charged with jaywalking who didn't
have ID. They spent 3 nights in jail because all the judges were in a
conference.
In theory, you aren't being held for refusing to ID, and the cops won't
make some minor charge up just to hold you. In practice....
--
Mickey McInnis - mcinnis@austin.ibm.com (mcinnis@vnet.ibm.com outside IBM)
------------------------------
From: amy young-leith <alyoung@cherry.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: 10 Nov 1994 09:38:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Kevin Kadow <kadokev@rci.ripco.com> wrote: Not in the USA, but true
in many other countries. You CAN be hassled by the police if you
don't have identification, and of course you need a drivers license
to drive (and the drivers license functions as a de facto national
ID card).
On a related tangent, I've had an arguement with friends over the issue
of what happens if you DO NOT carry your driver's license with you.
If you are pulled over and you HAVE a valid drivers license issued to
you, but you don't have it WITH you (it's at home on the table or in
your purse slung on the chair or...), is THAT a crime? Will you be
charged with something? Will you have any chance to obtain your
license to avoid this charge if there is one?
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ Amy Young-Leith Bloomington, Indiana Lifetime Student
\ /\ (That thing to the left is a bunny!)
( ) The views expressed within represent only my opinions.
.( o ). http://nickel.ucs.indiana.edu/~alyoung
------------------------------
From: lawrence@combdyn.com (Lawrence *The Dreamer* Chen)
Date: 10 Nov 1994 21:38:11 GMT
Subject: Re: Must I Always Carry I.D?
Organization: Combustion Dynamics Ltd.
coreynelso@aol.com (CoreyNelso) writes: I friend recently told me
that he thought you HAVE to carry I.D. of some kind with you at all
times. I don't think you need "your papers please" just to walk
around the block. Does any one have any ideas about this?
Along a similar line.....if I'm supposed to have ID, what constitutes
valid ID? Does it have to have a photograph? If so, just where does
one get one aside from their passport?
Everybody seems to automatically ask for a driver's licence as ID, but
I don't have one of these beasts....because I have no use for having
one. Something about being able to ensure that I can see when I'm
driving (I see well enough to work infront of a 19" monitor, but if you
want me to see distance accurately that's another story).
--
WORK: lawrence@combdyn.com | PHONE 403 529 2162 | FAX 529 2516 | VE6LKC
HOME: dreamer@lhaven.uumh.ab.ca | 403 526 6019 | 529 5102 | VE6PAQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praxis Society K12 BBS - 403 529 1610 | Lunatic Haven BBS - 403 526 6957
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
disclamer = (working_for && !representing) + (Combustion Dynamics Ltd.);
------------------------------
From: bennett@cs.niu.edu (Scott Bennett)
Date: 09 Nov 1994 22:53:52 -0600
Subject: Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Organization: Northern Illinois University
Winn Bill <WinnB@rnd1.indy.tce.com> wrote: There is a supermarket
chain in Indiana, Marsh Supermarkets, that has a discount card
program called "Fresh IDEA" (Instant Discounts Electronically
Applied). The idea behind the program is one completes an
application and gets a discount card in return. When making
purchases at Marsh, holders of this card are given unpublished
discounts. The application has some very interesting, and
intrusive, questions. Many of the questions, sans the multiple
choice answers, follow. Remember, this is a discount card program
for a supermarket
Sounds like Marsh Supermarkets is a latecomer to this sort of offensive
marketing measure. Jewel Tea (Jewel Foods) has been up to this
nonsense for at least a year now. Jewel calls it the "Preferred Card."
--
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
Systems Programming
Computer Center
Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, Illinois 60115
**********************************************************************
* Internet: bennett@netmgr.cso.niu.edu bennett@cs.niu.edu *
* BITNET: A01SJB1@NIU *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in *
* controversy."--John Jay, First Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court *
* in Georgia vs. Brailsford, 1794 *
**********************************************************************
------------------------------
From: johnl@iecc.com (John R Levine)
Date: 10 Nov 94 22:15 EST
Subject: Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Organization: I.E.C.C., Cambridge, Mass.
[long list of nosy questions on supermarket discount card] The
owner/CEO of the chain has been sent a letter inquiring as to why
all of this information is needed for a coupon card, but thus far
there has been no reply.
They're compiling prospect lists for junk mail, of course. On most of
those cards all you really need to fill out is name and address, and
you don't even have to do that truthfully. In may cases the card
doubles as a check cashing card (for people who haven't figured out
that if you pay with your Visa card you get a month's free float) so in
that case the name, address, and bank reference had better match. They
all ask for SSN, but I've only run into one (Stop and Shop) who refused
to give me a checks cashing card without one.
--
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com
Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies"
------------------------------
From: morris@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us (Mike Morris)
Date: 10 Nov 1994 11:18:34 GMT
Subject: Re: Intrusive Supermarket Card
Organization: College Park Software, Altadena, CA
Winn Bill <WinnB@rnd1.indy.tce.com> writes: There is a supermarket
chain in Indiana, Marsh Supermarkets, that has a discount card
program called "Fresh IDEA" (Instant Discounts Electronically
Applied). The idea behind the program is one completes an
application and gets a discount card in return. When making
purchases at Marsh, holders of this card are given unpublished
discounts. The application has some very interesting, and
intrusive, questions. Many of the questions, sans the multiple
choice answers, follow. Remember, this is a discount card program
for a supermarket (analogous to using coupons), not a security
clearance application. [long list of questions]
Sounds like market research to me - if you have a P.O. Box why not fill
it out, with answers appropriate for a deceased anccestor, and a ssn
with a 9x center digit string (never used for a real ssn). Give them
minimal info - i.e. no kids, no smoking, rent, no insomnia, diabetes,
not in military service, no computer, no beer, etc. See how much promo
stuff to that name appears in the PO box.
I've done similar tricks and been able to pin a lot of stuff on various
mailing list sellers that say "we don't sell out list". Yes, they
don't. They rent it.
--
Mike Morris WA6ILQ | All opinions must be my own since nobody pays
PO Box 1130 | me enough to be their mouthpiece...
Arcadia, CA. 91077 |
ICBM: 34.12N, 118.02W | Reply to: morris@grian.cps.altadena.ca.us
------------------------------
From: Bob Bales <74774.1326@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 10 Nov 1994 11:30:02 GMT
Subject: Medical System Security Reply
Organization: National Computer Security Association
The National Computer Security Association (NCSA) is hosting the
2nd Medical System Security Symposium on November 16-17, in
Washington, DC. The proceedings from this symposium include,
inter alia, the US OTA report on Health System Security and the
new (standalone) chapter from Benjamin Wright's book "Law of
Electronic Commerce", which treats the subject of the protection
of medical records.
The moderator for the symposium is recognized security expert Dr.
Michel Kabay, a frequent contributor to the RISKS digest,
columnist for Computing Canada, Interex Magazine and Network
World, and Director of Education for the NCSA.
Anyone interested in more information about this symposium can
send me an EMail; I'll respond promptly with details.
--
Bob Bales | CompuServe InfoSec Forum: GO NCSA
Natl Computer Security Assoc| Phone: 717-258-1816
10 South Courthouse Avenue | Fax: 717-243-8642
Carlisle, PA 17013 | Email: 74774.1326@compuserve.com
------------------------------
From: anonymous <levine@blatz.cs.uwm.edu>
Date: 10 Nov 1994 11:40:33 GMT
Subject: Re: Sears Captures Signatures
Organization: College Park Software, Altadena, CA
"Prof. L. P. Levine" <levine@blatz.cs.uwm.edu> writes: Since my
original post concerning Sears now digitizing signatures when you
sign a credit card slip, bunches of people :-) have sent me Email,
either asking for elaboration on the risks involved, or adding
anecdotes of their own. I'll attempt to describe the potential
risks as I see them.
UPS also digitizes signatures using a clip-board style computer with a
receipt form on it... And my best friend's was forged by UPS onto one
of their forms authorizing them to withdraw funds to pay UPS shipping
charges. I wonder how many signatres are on file.
His company fell for a UPS "trial period" for daily pickup from his
start-up company. I don't know the details but UPS was supposed to
bill him monthly. Instead they were withdrawing daily. My friend is
VP of the company, and was out of town the day the UPS sales-slime
visited the co. The pres signed some forms. He specifically told the
sales-slime he wanted monthly billing.
Several weeks later the company bounced a check. Investigation
revealed daily UPS withdrawls and several for next-day airfreight of
packages that were marked for the cheapest ground transit.
The pres asked the salesman to get the regional manager to visit us.
It took about 3 weeks to get everybody in the same room at the same
time. The UPS sales-slime produced a form signed by my friend
authorizing the daily withdrawls, and dated the day the sales-slime
visited the co. My friend produced his ATM card, pointed out the
number, and produced a ATM receipt dated & timed 3 hours later 650
miles away on the same day. Also a round trip airline ticket with a
departure the previous day and return 3 days after. There were some
interesting discussions concerning fraud and forgery.
My friend has never signed a UPS clipboard at the co. address - just at
home, 12 miles away. He rents, so his name was not cross-ref'd via
address. The last package he signed for at the house was over 4 months
earlier.
Anyway, the end result was that the company had to close out the
account and change _banks_ - not just accounts - to get UPS out of the
company funds.
I believe that the sales-slime was canned.
If you publish this, please keep my name & email address confidential.
[moderator: I did. The address at the top of this document is mine.]
------------------------------
From: "Houston, James A." <JH2@scires.com>
Date: 10 Nov 1994 08:42:56 -0600 (CST)
Subject: E-mail headers
Can anyone enlighten me on the subject of email headers? My question
stems from recent discussion regarding whether someone else's mail can
be read. My question is this, *if* a "blind" carbon copy is directed
to the president of my company, can I see that transaction in the
header, or is that type of thing controlled by the email application
being used, e.g., ccmail?
I just want to know if there is a way to *detect* if my mail is being
directed to secret places I normally would not be aware of.
------------------------------
From: <ashton@VNET.IBM.COM> (Gerard J. Ashton)
Date: 10 Nov 1994 15:28:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Other People's E-mail
Organization: IBM Microelectronics Division
One case I treat differently depending on whether it is paper mail or
e-mail is mail sent to me by mistake. If I receive paper mail at home
by mistake, I write "no such person at this address" on it, put it in
my mail box, and raise the red flag so the mail carrier will pick it
up.
If I receive e-mail at work by mistake at work, I read enough of the
message to figure out where it should go, and send it to the
appropriate person along with an explaination (if possible).
Otherwise, I reply to the sender. I don't know of any specific policy
about misdirected e-mail, but I feel my approach is consistent with the
general policies of respect for the individual and service to the
customer.
I have e-mail access at home, but never received any misdirected e-mail
there.
I never received any misdirected paper mail at work that would have
required opening it to figure out the correct destination.
Any laws passed on this subject should try to strike a good balance
about when it is acceptable for an end-user to read the body of a
message in order to forward misdirected e-mail to the correct
destination, and when it is not. This is especially true in the case
where e-mail gets to the right company but the wrong employee.
--
Gerard Ashton IBM Microelectronics Division
Phone: (802) 769-5667 Essex Junction, Vermont
Send Internet E-mail to ashton@vnet.ibm.com
------------------------------
From: "Prof. L. P. Levine" <levine@blatz.cs.uwm.edu>
Date: 11 Nov 1994 09:52:43 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
The following was taken from the cpsr-global listserver.
From: Judi Clark <judic@manymedia.com>
Subject: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
Judi Clark wrote a note to another group about this resource.
It may be useful in countries where there are ongoing battles
about who owns health information, earnings, etc. of an
individual.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
You can read it from the web
at the URL: http://www.manymedia.com/prc/ (look for the publications
list). You can also reach them through other methods:
E-mail: prc@teetot.acusd.edu
Gopher: gopher gopher.acusd.edu
Ftp: ftp ftp.acusd.edu
user name: anonymous
password: guest
ftp>cd pub/privacy
I hope this helps.
--
judi
------------------------------
From: "Prof. L. P. Levine" <levine@blatz.cs.uwm.edu>
Date: 26 Sep 1994 12:45:51 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Info on CPD, Contributions, Subscriptions, FTP, etc.
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
The Computer Privacy Digest is a forum for discussion on the effect of
technology on privacy or vice versa. The digest is moderated and
gatewayed into the USENET newsgroup comp.society.privacy (Moderated).
Submissions should be sent to comp-privacy@uwm.edu and administrative
requests to comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu.
If you read this from the comp.society.privacy newsgroup and wish to
contribute a message, you should simply post your contribution. As a
moderated newsgroup, attempts to post to the group are normally turned
into eMail to the submission address below.
On the other hand, if you read the digest eMailed to you, you generally
need only use the Reply feature of your mailer to contribute. If you
do so, it is best to modify the "Subject:" line of your mailing.
Contributions generally are acknowledged within 24 hours of
submission. An article is printed if it is relevant to the charter of
the digest. If selected, it is printed within two or three days. The
moderator reserves the right to delete extraneous quoted material. He
may change the subject line of an article in order to make it easier
for the reader to follow a discussion. He will not, however, alter or
edit or append to the text except for purely technical reasons.
A library of back issues is available on ftp.cs.uwm.edu [129.89.9.18].
Login as "ftp" with password identifying yourid@yoursite. The archives
are in the directory "pub/comp-privacy".
People with gopher capability can most easily access the library at
gopher.cs.uwm.edu.
Mosaic users will find it at gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu.
Older archives are also held at ftp.pica.army.mil [129.139.160.133].
---------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Leonard P. Levine | Moderator of: Computer Privacy Digest
Professor of Computer Science | and comp.society.privacy
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee | Post: comp-privacy@uwm.edu
Box 784, Milwaukee WI 53201 | Information: comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu
| Gopher: gopher.cs.uwm.edu
levine@cs.uwm.edu | Mosaic: gopher://gopher.cs.uwm.edu
---------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
------------------------------
End of Computer Privacy Digest V5 #061
******************************
.