THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF CANADA
THE QUEBEC REFERENDUM
THE GRAND CANAL PROJECT
US-CANADIAN CONTINENTAL UNION BY 2005
The series of postings that you are about to see tell a
story so amazing, so full of callous corruption and
greed, so destructive to the Quebec and Cree peoples
and to the Canadian nation, and so *well-concealed*
by those in the Canadian media who are *fully aware*
of these details, that you deserve a full and clear
introduction to each of the main narrators:
GLEN KEALEY: is the former Hull, Quebec, commercial
developer who exposed the system of organized crime
and corruption run by ex-Prime Minister Mulroney's
government and the complicity of the RCMP and the
justice system.
In 1986 Kealey was asked for a bribe by Public
Works Minister Roch LaSalle, who offered him
government support for his project in exchange for
5% of all government contributions on top of
$5,000 up front. Investigating, Kealey found evidence
of a massive bribe and kickback scheme operated
and controlled right out of the Prime Minister's
Office, and a close collaboration between the Tories,
the media and the police. Kealey successfully charged
16 people, including members of the government and
RCMP, with criminal conspiracy. He is co-chair of
THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INTEGRITY in
Ottawa [819 -778 1705; fax 613-747 1644]
SHELLEY ANN CLARK: the executive assistant to
Germain Denis, Brian Mulroney's personal appointee
to the Free Trade Agreement negotiations, during
which plans were made to dismember and demolish
Canada, first by Quebec's separation, and then
by Continental Union in 2005.
GEORGE KRALIK: An eleven-year veteran of the
Canadian Armed Forces.
PLEASE RE-POST THE ENTIRE SERIES
THE FOLLOWING ASTOUNDING INTERVIEW HAS BEEN
EXTRACTED FROM "NEW WORLD ORDER: CORRUPTION
IN CANADA", PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER, 1994,
BUT NOW OUT OF PRINT
Kralik: I would like to ask you about the water,
our natural resources in water. What is it to be used
for? How is it to be transported?
Kealey: Think of money. If you had your choice, if
you could pull a genie out of a bottle and the genie
could grant three wishes, what would your three wishes
be? Remember your goal is to make the most money
possible?
Kralik: I should really have to think a lot about
that, but...
Kealey: I would say: 'Number one, give me control
over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air.
Number three give me control over water.' Now, leaving
our little genie aside, we know we cannot control the
sun, nor can we control the air. BUT WE CAN CONTROL
WATER. On the scale of things that are required for
human life, it is the most important element that
can be controlled.
Kralik: What do you mean when you say 'control'?
Kealey: OK. In GATT, General Agreement on Trades and
Tariffs, it says that free-flowing water is not a'good'.
The key wording is 'free-flowing'. If you construct a
dam it is no longer free-flowing and therefore it becomes
private property, owned by somebody, capable of being
sold to others, or mortgaged.
Kralik: If it is dammed?
Kealey: If it is dammed. Any time the free-flowing
water has been obstructed. Of course in GATT, there is
much talk about bottled water.
Kralik: It's a side trick?
Kealey: It's a side trick. The biggest scam ever to
be pulled on the entire world is Free Trade and I'll
tell you why.
There is a lady in Ottawa by the name of Shelley
Ann Clark. She was the executive secretary to the third
highest negotiator during the Free Trade deal. His name
was Germain Denis. His two visible superiors were Gordon
Ritchie and Simon Riesman. Before he became Free Trade
negotiator, Simon Reisman had a difficult job. He was
the director of a project called the Grand Canal, which
is to be built from James Bay.
In 1985-86, my offices were in Hull in the commercial
part in Place de Portage, the government complex which
houses the Supply and Services Offices. [NOTE: Hull,
Quebec is just across the river from Ottawa, Ontario,
and is filled with federal offices and civil servants]
One day I was visited by a man named Art Bailey. Bailey
was a former Assistant Deputy Minister of Supply and
Services and had been following the development
of my project, the Micot Building. I had raised a
hundred and sixty million bucks to build this high tech
centre in Hull. We had bought the land and were just
about ready to start construction when Art Bailey walked
into my office. 'Mr. Kealey,'he said, 'You've done a
fantastic job of marketing this Micot Building.
Nobody would ever have believed that anyone could
raise a hundred and sixty million dollars to build a
building in Hull - this is totally out of sync with
anything that anybody believed.' So he said, 'We think
you're the best marketing man in Canada and that
you should come and join our team and become the
Marketing Manager for the Grand Canal.'
I said, 'What the hell's the Grand Canal? I don't
know what you're talking about.' So he gave me a
document - a twenty to twenty-five page document -
which I read. This is what I read: James Bay is five
hundred miles north to south, is a hundred and
twenty miles across at the mouth, salt water on the
average thirty-five to forty-five feet deep. If a
dam were to be constructed at the mouth of James Bay
and Hudson's Bay and a second one, one third down,
and a third, a third down again - therefore three
dams - it would allow over a period of ten years for
water to flow from the fresh water rivers and would
push the salt water back beyond the dams and create
the largest fresh water reservoir known to man. So
much so that a canal could be built leading out
of the south-east corner of James Bay, south over
the mountain ranges with dykes and locks and
whatever you need to lift water for eight hundred
miles, then at Rouen-Noranda in northern Quebec,
nature's gravity would take over and the water
would start going down the other side of the
mountain range, in Ontario, the Ottawa River and
the French River systems, past Kirkland lake and
eventually it would end up in Georgian Bay [in
Lake Superior]. The amount of water that would
be brought back - fresh water from that Canal
- could double the flow of water that now enters
the Great lakes. Of course, if you can double the
water entering the Great lakes you can take half of
the total water out without changing anything in the
Great Lake System.
The water would be removed in two places: at the base
of Lake Michigan - they don't need it this year, this
year they have enough water - they would open up the
sluices and move water down to the Mississippi Delta,
almost all the way to Mexico, in the Gulf of Mexico;
the second outlet would be from Lake Superior, moving
water across Manitoba, into Saskatchewan, then down
into the United States to bring water to the Mid West
and South West of the United States. We must
understand, of course, that since we are living in a
period of global warming, the bread basket of North
America which is situated in one place now, moves
further north as it gets warmer, making the bottom
part arid. So water is absolutely critical to
enlarge the bread basket of North America as the
earth gets warmer.
There is another dimension: if Canadian waters,
presently flowing into and towards the Arctic and the
North of Canada, are diverted and artificially made
to flow in a southerly direction (for instance diverted
towards the United States for water use), then the
Northern cold climate temperatures will move in a
southerly direction and the Canadian terrain will
become colder and more frigid; the balance of the
Canadian climate will be reduced temperature, which
will cause a massive environmental shift in Canada,
all to Canada's detriment.
This theory can be supported by simple physics and
hydrology. The waters flowing north are of a warmer
temperature and have a warm front pushing against
the Arctic North temperatures; if removed, the Arctic
North will move South. It doesn't matter whether this
occurs in summer or the winter seasons. If the rivers
and waters are diverted to flow southerly then one
will require more fuel to heat our homes and
buildings; however, Canadians will only have what is
available after the U.S. has its needs supplied under
the NAFTA Agreement, etc.
The two transnationals who were pushing this plan were
R. J. R. Nabisco (the biggest agribusiness in the
United States), led by a Mr. Johnson out of Winnipeg -
there's been a film made of him recently called
"Barbarians at the Gate" and it shows how he tried
to take over the company with junk bonds and whatever;
and the other one was Archer Daniels Midland, which
cans and boxes or packages all of the agri-business
that comes in from R.J.R. Nabisco and distributes
it throughout the world. It is interesting, of
course, that Mr. Johnson was Mulroney's sponsor,
bringing him on tours throughout the U.S. and that
Archer Midland Daniels has just hired [ex-Prime
Minister] Mulroney [who pushed both Free Trade and
NAFTA through the Canadian Parliament] as a director.
I traveled across Western Canada and there have
been public demonstrations recently in B.C., Alberta,
and Saskatchewan over the building of dams and
Kemano in B.C., Old Man River in Alberta and Alimeda
in Rafferty dams in Saskatchewan. People ask why are
they building dams where there is no water. Once you
understand the relationship of the Grand Canal to the
entire area you then know where the water will be
coming from.
Kralik: Do you see any possible ecological disasters
as a result this ?
Kealey: Of course. Some natives believe the sheer
weight of the water behind the dams will cause the
axis of the earth to shift and if you build a dam you
change the chemistry of the earth. You cannot flood
the areas that we are talking about without changing
the configuration of the soil and landscape. But
transnationals don't think in those terms: they
think in terms of money. In 1985-86 it was stated t
hat the project would cost two hundred billion
dollars (U.S.). It was also stated that the
money was available.
American Express wants to be the banker and do you
think that it is by coincidence that American Express
was allowed, by Order of Council, to become a Bank in
Canada, with Brian Mulroney breaking fourteen banking
regulations just to allow them to achieve this status?
As well, Alcan Aluminum needs dams for their mines
and Barrick for their gold-owning concerns. Mulroney
also signed Orders in Council breaking the law that
made it illegal for foreigners to own more than fifty
percent of a mine in Canada.Now foreigners can own
mines outright in Canada: there are no restrictions.
None of these changes in the rules were made
through Parliament but by a stroke of Brian
Mulroney's pen. Most people in Canada Live with the
illusion that laws are written by Parliament,
but most regulations are changed by politicians in
power. For every law that passes though Parliament,
there are three thousand laws that are changed
unilaterally behind the scenes.
In any case, Simon Riesman put forward a plan to
have us put aside our 'old concepts' and to start
thinking 'boldly about the future'. By that he meant
nothing less than giving up Canada: we need to have
a new political reality, he argued, and therefore
Free Trade and water diversion go hand in hand. We
also know, he surmised, that if the US asked us for
either water or free trade, Canadians would rebel:
so let us make it appear that Canada is doing the
asking. Mulroney was bought with the Bankers'
money and he did the asking, publicly stating the
opposite of what he had always contended: that he
didn't believe in Free Trade, etc.
BACK ROOM MANIPULATIONS IN FREE TRADE DEAL
I know what was negotiated in the Free Trade deal
and how the deal was done because my executive
secretary [NOTE: now his wife] is Shelley Ann
Clark, who worked as the executive secretary to
Germain Denis, the third highest-ranking negotiator.
This is how the deal was done - Simon Reisman and
Gordon Ritchie went to Washington and gave away
Canada and as they were giving away Canada they
were at the time preparing a briefing book on a
computer which appeared simultaneously on a computer
in Ottawa. Mulroney and Denis worked together and
Shelley Ann Clark was the secretary working between
the two of them.
There was one hitch. Although the Federal
Government did not legally need the permission of
the Premiers, politically Free Trade would have been
impossible to sell unless the Premiers were on side.
So two Premiers were bought by Mulroney - the
Premier of Alberta and the Premier of Saskatchewan.
They became Mulroney's moles within the Premier's
camp.
Their job was to go around and identify the
acceptable bottom lines in terms of textiles,
agriculture, mining, subsidies, unemployment insurance,
health care - all of the things that affect our
sovereignty. What would the Premiers be prepared to
sacrifice? The two moles would then bring the info
to Denis, whose job it was to brief the Premiers
approximately eight times during the negotiations.
How was this done? Since there were a bunch of
Premiers who would have disagreed fundamentally if
they knew what was really happening, and you knew
what their bottom lines were, Premiers' briefings
were always given at 50 O'Connor on the seventeenth
floor. At midnight the night before a briefing,
Shelley Ann Clark would be told to come into Denis'
office - only he and she would be in the office -
and call up the briefing books on the computer. She
would then be ordered to re-name a copy of the
entire briefing book negotiated that day to The
Provincial Briefing Book. Denis would then take the
notes he had got from the Premiers about the bottom
lines and go through the main document paragraph by
paragraph.
Here are some examples. He would come to the section
on 'Water'- build a Grand Canal, build dams, move
water to the U.S. - and he would say,'Delete that
paragraph and insert a line that says 'free-flowing
water is not included in this deal." Textiles? 'If
it said we have given up sixty percent, change it
to twelve.' Ms.Clark would change it to twelve.
Agriculture? 'Cut back on the production of turkeys
forty percent. Write in eight.'
And they would go through the entire book like
that. At the end - at about three o'clock in the
morning - they would produce ten copies. Every
page of each new copy was numbered so that
if a page went missing or was copied in any way,
they would know which Premier would have done it.
Not that they were given a chance to do this!
The Premiers would arrive for the briefing session,
always complaining about not having been given the
books ahead of time. 'It is too sensitive,' they
were told, 'here's the Briefing Book.' At the end
of the session Denis would pick up the Briefing
Books, and Shelley Anne Clark would shred nine of
the books and keep one, so that Denis would
remember what lies he had told when he would have
to change the books next time.
Kralik: The reason why he changed the percentages
of the cutbacks in productions was to make it look
favourable?
Kealey: And acceptable, politically, to the
Premiers. That they were not giving away what they
*were* giving away. And once it is given away, how
can you ever get it back?
Kralik: What they were negotiating, with relation
to textiles, turkeys, or whatever was a kind of smoke-
screen cover for the big Grand Canal ?
Kealey: Everything in there was doctored. There
were two key issues that we didn't hear anything about:
the integration of Canada into the United States, and
the movement of water through the Grand Canal. Those
are the two key issues. How do you do that without
anybody knowing? On 3 October 1987 the Free Trade
Agreement was signed in Washington. A thirty-three
page summary was delivered to Parliament. *The
original text has never been seen by the public.*
A year later a legal document of some fifteen
hundred pages detailing the ramifications of
certain items was made public and is used by lawyers
today. *But what is not known, what has not been seen
is the original Free Trade Deal which is at least two
hundred and some odd pages long.* Because Shelley Ann
Clark knows what she knows, and because of the
contacts that she now has, she is a threat to the
government [i.e. the previous, Mulroney, government]
Last December (1992) they sent her home on full pay.
Kralik: Laid off.
Kealey: No, not laid off. She has her full pay. She
was told, 'Go home. We don't want you talking to people.'
What they didn't know then, was that home for her meant,
in July 1993, becoming my executive secretary.
Kralik: What a bonus! That is great!
Kealey: They haven't touched her in any way because
they were afraid. She still has her top security
clearance, but when she went to the archives and asked
to see the Free Trade Documents, she was given an
index which she skimmed through and questioned:
'There's no Premier's Briefing Books here?' The guy
answered: 'Well it's possible. We didn't get everything.
We don't know. We just get what we get.' So she said,
'May I see the Free Trade Deal ? "Oh, no,'he resumed,'
under the Statute that governs access to information,
ninety-five percent of the Free Trade Deal has been
declared a security problem for Canada and is not
being made available to the public. Even with your
top security clearance, you could not get it unless you
had the 0.K. from the Deputy Minister of External
Affairs.' So she said, 'You know who I am and that's
not possible: he would never give it to me.' She
was told, 'In any event the Free Trade Deal is in
canisters 16 miles outside of Ottawa and is not to be
seen by Canadians for thirty years. "This doesn't make
any sense in a democratic country,' she said,'Why can
the people not see it? I know what is in it and it's a
danger to our national security all right. It gives
the country away and thirty years from now it is going
to be too late. The implementation schedule ends at 2005.
The Grand Canal must be in place and Quebec must be
separate.
THE INTEGRATION OF CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES
Kealey: Plot for a movie: The date is the early
1960's. Dag Hammerskjold, the Secretary General of
the UN, is flying between countries on the Lower
African continent. He has been trouble-shooting
border disputes which are being caused by the
competition for access to mineral deposits.
Suddenly two fighter planes pull up alongside the
UN plane and, without warning, shoot it down with
missiles. The next day the world media report it as
an 'accident'.
Fade to secret rendez-vous: Two mercenaries (the
pilots of the fighter planes) are paid by under-cover
agent employed by the TRANSNATIONAL MINING CABAL
(funded by Rothschild-Rockefeller).
Fade to the New York (or Philadelphia) boardroom
of Hanna Mining. It is now the late 1970's.
The same under-cover agent, an employee of Hanna
Mining, quietly admits his role in the assassination
to the Board of Directors. The admission bothers no one.
Attention then turns to another internal problem. A
Canadian branch operation company President, Brian
Mulroney, of The Iron Ore Company of Canada, is being
asked to shut down the Schefferville mine in Quebec.
This is a very profitable mine, but one which competes
successfully against the less profitable U.S. mines
the Cabal also own. Mulroney is not-so-subtly
reminded (blackmailed) by other directors, who
threaten to expose the way he once looted the company
pension fund in order to start the construction
of his grand pet project, the Lord's Inn, which is to
be built in Labrador (the hotel is an exact replica of
Montreal's Ritz Carleton Hotel). Mulroney wisely agrees.
Fades to Schefferville. Families are being torn apart
by the closing of the mine. Mulroney pays off the
trouble-makers and the local media to keep things quiet.
He badly wants to become a national politician and
doesn't need bad publicity.
Fade to Paris, France. It is now October 1980: George
Bush, Edward Meese, Earl Casey and a Dr. Brian are
observed surreptitiously negotiating with Iranians.
They want them to hold onto the American hostages until
after the US elections and the inauguration on 20
January 1981. They promise arms for the hostages if
Ronald Reagan is elected. They also agree to sell the
Iranians more arms later, to raise money for the
Nicaraguan Contras.
Fade to Washington. It is 20 January 1981: Reagan
and Bush are being inaugurated. The hostages are being
released simultaneously.
Fade to Oval office. It is 21 January 1981: Trans-
national corporate leaders and bankers tell Reagan,
'The US is broke. If it were corporation it would be
shut down. The answer lies in a political merger with
Canada. But first the two countries must be 'HARMONIZED'.
The plan evolves on the spot (between 1985 and 2005):
Back Mulroney with cash and spin-doctors. Send
money through the Mormon Bishop of Virginia, up to
Winnipeg, and then to Montreal.
Once elected, link Mulroney with Simon Reisman,
the former Deputy Minister of Finance. Reisman is
presently the Director of the Grand Canal fresh water
diversion scheme.
Appoint Reisman to lead a negotiating team which
arrives from Canada begging for a Free Trade Deal. Let
them pretend to be negotiating while they actually just
follow a given pre-set IMPLEMENTATION SCHEME designed
to harmonize Canada's laws to the USA.
Write into the Free Trade deal the secret
arrangements made to change Canada's foreign ownership
laws by ORDERS IN COUNCIL, at once.
Replace the Canadian Government with the Bankers'
second division team, the Liberals (TORY II). This will
help allay most peoples' fears and continue the illusion
of existing democracy and independence.
Manage the separation of Quebec by placing the
trans-national bankers' man, Lucien Bouchard, at the
head of the separatist movement.
Get the Canadian Government to back native
claims against Quebec and publicly support the
native's right to self-determination.
Keep scaring Canadians with talk of the
deficit. Raise taxes, reduce services. Increase drug
patent protection. Cut employment to a minimum.
People will then accept any conditions for employment
proposed later, by the wealthy trans-national job
creators. Build more dams.
Borrow 100 billion dollars for the
construction of water diversion projects across the
north. When the project is at its mid-point, try to
borrow a further 100 billion dollars. This second loan
will be denied.
When the International Monetary Fund
declares that Canada is clearly insolvent, a general
panic sets in. The Prime Minister runs down to
Washington to plead for more credit. He is told loans
are available on the condition Canada merges with the
USA. This new deal would create a new country - the
United States of NORTH America.
The PM returns to Canada and informs
Canadians about the American offer. He states, 'there
is no other choice'and civil war breaks out in Quebec.
Natives of Ungava (northern Quebec) declare unilateral
independence. The QPF attack native reserves from
helicopters. The PM calls upon the UN for military
assistance - on the pretext of defending the CREE
[from the attacking Quebec forces].
Military from Fort Drum, New York, all
wearing the UN Blue Berets, cross the border at
Kingston. Within two hours they surround Parliament
in Ottawa. Others move north by air and take charge
of the power Plant at James Bay.
Later, Quebec is partitioned by the UN and
the World Bank takes control of the water projects.
Quebec is placed under a UN-sponsored economic
blockade until they finally agree to use English as
the working language. Quebec becomes the 55th State
of the USNA etc., etc., etc.
Kealey: Let us take all of this a little more slowly:
a plane is flying over Africa with the Secretary
General of the United Nations sitting in it when all
of a sudden two fighter planes show up alongside and
shoot it down. Movie switches back over to a
boardroom with the heads of TRANSNATIONAL corporations
in mining, agri-business and finance in the US planning
for the election of their man to lead the United States
for four terms, George Bush. The strategy is devised:
put a Charlie McCarthy-type dummy in for the first eight
years, Ronald Reagan, with George Bush's hand in the
back of the jacket which wags and makes him talk.
Kralik: So it's your opinion that Reagan was a
good front man for George Bush?
Kealey: Bush was the man fronting for the
transnational corporations, former head of the CIA,
involved in drug peddling and raising money for them in
that way.
Upon taking over the reins of the country, George
Bush and Ronald Reagan call in the presidents of the
key transnational companies with their accountants and
say: 'Tell us the real picture.' The accountants tell
them that if the United States were a corporation it
would have to be shut down immediately. It is
bankrupt. 'We have wasted our resources. We have ruined
our cities. Our assets and debts don't balance.'
The critical question is then put: what is the
solution? 'There is only one solution. We must merge
Canada politically with the US if we are to re-balance
the books. Canada is virgin country with a multitude of
natural resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc. Add
Canada to the U.S. and you'll have re-balanced the
picture for a long time to come. "How do we do that?
We can't merge Canada and the US politically. Canada
has a province that speaks French. "Get them to
separate! "How do we do that?'
Then the president of Hanna Mining, who has been
sitting the table, stands up and says, 'I have a
division called the Iron Ore Company of Canada and
I have a man there by the name of Brian Mulroney.
He just shut down the town of Schefferville,
Quebec for me, and he did an excellent job. Shutting
down Canada wouldn't be much of a problem for him.
Let's bring him in'. 'Exactly, but, can he be trusted?'
'Well our man Reisman has been Deputy Minister of
Finance in Canada for a while. He is in charge of this
Grand Canal project.We need the water and we can get
them to work together as a team. "But how do we get
the money to them? "The Mormon Church in Virginia is
tied into the Republican party, so we can move the
money across to Utah, then up into Winnipeg
(Jake Epp and his group), keep it all secret
and fund Mulroney's campaign for the leadership of
the Conservative party - then we're in business.
'Don't forget there's just been a Referendum in
Quebec and they voted to stay with Canada. So
there is a job to be done and it can't be done
in a short period of time.'
They decide that it is going to take fourteen
or fifteen years to put the whole project together;
in the interval, the economies, social programs,
and laws of the two countries would be quietly
harmonized as much as possible. 'But you know
Canadians are pretty up tight about things like
that, so you can't tell them, you've got to keep
things fairly quiet. "Don't worry about it. We
own the leaders of the Liberal party and the
leaders of the Tory party. They are all on our
team: it is just that ordinary bureaucrats
don't know what game they are playing.'
We have here a project that begins in 1981, is
formalized through 1981 and 1982. In 1983 Mulroney
wins a seat in Nova Scotia. In 1984 there is one
Tory in Quebec, his name is Roch La Salle and he
sees this hoard of people and money pouring in in
support of this Brian Mulroney. If Mulroney gets
elected in Quebec, Roch La Salle's power will
evaporate, so he fights tooth and nail with Joe
Clark to try to keep Mulroney out.
On election day Mulroney wins. He is now the
leader of the Conservative Party and he becomes
the leader of the government of Canada on 4
September 1984. The next thing that happens is
that within eleven days of the election four
break-ins occur: at PC headquarters in Montreal,
PC party headquarters, PC Canada Fund, and at
the office of David Angus (Mulroney's
communications director) and Rodrigue Pageau
(Mulroney's chief of Staff).
The four break-ins are noticed on the following
Monday morning. Montreal police are called in.
The break-ins are unusual in the sense that only
information has been taken: the safe that
contained the documents as to the source of
Mulroney's funds, computer discs, a photocopier
on which they had attempted first to copy
documents but obviously ran out of time, and a
computer.
Yet there was cash, calculators, and typewriters
that were not touched at all. The safe was heavy
enough that it required at least three people to
lift and take out.
The Montreal Police were conducting their
investigation when along came a member of the RCMP,
Denis LaPointe, who stated: 'I've been sent from
Ottawa to find out how the investigations are coming
along. Can I help?' Without his knowledge, a reporter
overheard the conversation, Richard Cleroux of The
Globe and Mail, and a story is printed in the Globe
that night.
The next morning the phone rings at The Globe
and Mail. Denis LaPointe is mad as hell: 'What
business is it of yours to write that?' Of course,
in fact, LaPointe had no authority to be there: he
hadn't been assigned to go there, but was acting
undercover for Brian Mulroney or Roch LaSalle and
other politicians, without Commissioner Simmonds
knowing this was even taking place.
When you probe into Denis LaPointe's background
you will find that he was raised in Joliette, Quebec.
His best buddies were Roch LaSalle and Frank Majeau
and he and Roch were involved in businesses; Majeau
was LaSalle's executive assistant but Majeau's main
business was 'prestige entertainment'. 'Prestige
Entertainment' delivered strippers to all the clubs
in Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec and moved
drugs out of Mirabel airport and the port of Montreal
through these strippers. This was actively assisted
by a limousine service owned by two Iranians. These
people were all linked.
Within a matter of days, the Montreal Police were
told to forget the investigation: 'It's not important.
Nothing they took was of any value.' But when Frank
Majeau came to testify at the hearing in 1991, he
revealed what subsequently had transpired. It was that
Roch LaSalle was invited to Quebec City by Mulroney's
accountant, Michel Cote, who had just been elected
and who had become the Minister of Consumer and
Corporate Affairs responsible for the Post Office as
well. And Michel Cote did something very strange for
Roch LaSalle, the sworn enemy of Brian Mulroney: he
paid off his entire debt load - four hundred thousand
dollars, mostly gambling debts to Frank Catroni. He
was THE BOSS: they are the Mob - the Mafia.
The second curious thing that happened was that Brian
Mulroney appointed Roch LaSalle Minister of Public
Works; when you understand the potential for
corruption at Public Works you realize that you don't
put Colonel Sanders in charge of the chicken coop
and expect the chickens to be there when you
come to collect.
The third thing that happened was that Andre
Bissonette, who had won the election in St. Jean,
was made Minister for Small Business, responsible
for the Federal Business Development Bank and
although the Federal Business Development Bank will
normally loan seventy-five thousand dollars to
companies to save them from going under and laying
off people (a large loan is a hundred and seventy-five
thousand dollars, but the average is about seventy-five).
Lo and behold, in this case The Federal Business
Development Bank made loans to thirty-nine strip
clubs in Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec, loans
of five hundred thousand dollars, nine hundred
thousand dollars - a total of seventeen million dollars.
The preponderance of circumstantial evidence
therefore suggests that Roch laSalle, Lapointe (a
member of the RCMP) and Frank Majeau (a member of
the mob), stole the safe, got the goods on Mulroney,
blackmailed him and got him to appoint LaSalle to
his important position: Minister of Public Works.
Of course [RCMP] Commissioner Simmonds, not
knowing about this internal arrangement proceeded
to investigate almost all of them during Mulroney's
first mandate as they were being caught
all over the place with their hands in the till.
Simmonds, you wilI remember, was called to a
meeting with Trudeau when Trudeau was looking
for a new Commissioner of the RCMP. Simmonds
was asked the question, 'If you were made
Commissioner of the RCMP and you discovered
tomorrow that I was a crook, what would you do?'
His answer was, 'I would arrest you personally,
Sir,' and Trudeau to his credit appointed him
Commissioner of the RCMP.
FACILITATING THE SEPARATION OF QUEBEC
Simmonds was not the type of RCMP Commissioner
that Mulroney needed. For Mulroney was empowered
to destroy the country and to destroy the country
he had to build a fund that could finance the
separation of Quebec. As we know, he brought
in his friend Lucien Bouchard to lead the project:
by adding five percent to the contracts and getting
his team in position within the RCMP so that they
could peddle drugs, the fund grew to such an extent
that when he left power there was sufficient money
to continue playing the game from behind the scenes.
What we have today is Mulroney's plan: one truly
National Party, the Liberals, with the most hated
politician in Quebec as its head, Jean Chretien.
Next you have Lucien Bouchard leading the
Official Opposition with the biggest block of
Separatists ever, and last you have Preston
Manning, leading a Reform Party - one gang that
says, 'We're leaving,' and the other one that
says, 'Go to hell.'
Kralik: To facilitate the split?
Kealey: To facilitate the split because this is
what is required. You cannot integrate Canada and
the United States as long as Quebec is there. Step
number one is the separation of Quebec by 1995. Step
number two is, sadly, to merge the rest of Canada with
the United States. Shelley Ann Clark says the material
she saw in the Trade Negotiations Office cited Canada
as a fifty-first state. Other CIA agents I know have
stated fifty-first, fifty-second, fifty-third, and
fifty-fourth states: the maritimes, Ontario, the
prairies, British Columbia with the northern
territories - four states. The third step is a
revolution by the Cree of Northern Quebec against a
separate Quebec - saying we're not going!
Kralik: A smoke screen?
Kealey: While the natives don't know the game, their
leaders must certainly know where they are going. More
likely than not they would have been bought off. The
natives themselves have no way of fighting back. Quebec
cabinet ministers want to buy helicopters because that
is the only effective military vehicle for that kind of
war, to put the natives in their place. In all
likelihood the United Nations would be called in under
the pretext of 'protecting'the indigenous peoples of
Northern Quebec from the 'oppressive' Quebecois who
want them to be a part of an independent Quebec. Blue
berets will be placed on the heads of whom? Most
likely, the soldiers located at Fort Drum, across
the bridge from Kingston [Ontario]. Fort Drum is
the largest military establishment in the US, with a
ground surface larger than Metro Toronto, supposedly
there for desert and jungle warfare training but
really to control the subversive elements in Canada,
and specifically the Cree in the north.
First, they overwhelm the Cree in the far north.
Then they get their hands on James Bay. Quebec is
shrunken down to its 1867 boundaries - five hundred
miles long, a hundred miles north to south along the
St. Lawrence River.
Now they have a hand on the hydro switch: they
build the Grand Canal with the water moving not
through Quebec but around Quebec: Quebec becomes
an island surrounded by the United States of
North America. The water is not free-flowing
and is, therefore, a 'good' under GATT and
the North American Free Trade Agreement.
So it becomes saleable and controllable, but
under the agreements we must give the US always
at least what they feel is necessary for their
purposes. We can increase the supply in gas and
water but we can never cut back. We can never
get back what we are giving away. During a crisis
we would have to plead with them to rescue us, and
in that situation we would, in all likelihood, be
treated like Louisiana or some of the poorer states
of the US.
A ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT
In this Free Trade Agreement, the US gets the
clean profitable business. Canada is the attic -
the warehouse of all the raw materials. Mexico is
the boiler room, the basement where all the dirty
work is done. That's the plan.
Kralik: Do you see this as a stepping-stone toward
the building of a New World Order and its
consolidation in a single global economy?
Kealey: Of course. The government that is being
set up through the United Nations resembles a church:
five percent of receipts goes to the poor - in Somalia,
Ethiopia, or whatever - although sometimes, as in
Somalia, it comes accompanied with guns. 95% goes toward
the maintenance of power and control. What control?
The International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, and
The Security Council, GATT.
Kralik: Who runs the International Monetary Fund?
Kealey: The bankers.
Kralik: Do you know who these bankers are?
Kealey: There are some fifteen or sixteen different
families but by far the two most influential are the
Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Up to the end of
the last century the Rothschilds operated strictly in
Europe, but they were anxious to synthesize the
American operation with their own. Investigators were
sent out and it was agreed that a railroad family,
the Rockefellers, were prepared to play the game,
and so they became the western arm of this operation.
Then in 1913 we have the biggest scam of all: the
denationalizing of the making of money and the creation
of the Federal Reserve [Bank], a deal between the
bankers and the politicians whereby the bankers promised
some politicians backing and almost certain re-election
in the elections they contended; in return, the
politicians handed over to the bankers the right to
do nothing less than print the money for the country.
'We'll do that for you," the bankers said, and you
can borrow from us.' It was passed on a Friday
afternoon with no warning and with Congress pretty
well empty. So much for democracy when the invisible
bankers really want something.
Kralik: The incredible implication of this is that
the Federal Reserve, which prints the greenbacks for
the American people, is a private bank.
Kealey: It is a private bank. The same thing
happened in Canada, after the customary twenty-year
delay - in 1935. MacKenzie King had won, lost, won,
lost four elections in a row. He wanted to ensure
his hold on the Prime Ministership for a long time,
so he in turn gave the bankers The Bank of Canada.
Let us examine the implications of that. Before
you give away the Federal Bank there is no need for
consumer or income taxes.: you can manufacture an
amount of money based on the resources of the country,
including its capacity for labour. The value is
constantly changing as new minerals are found and
the labour force becomes more and more productive.
In a situation where the National Government prints
money, for every dollar sold to banks two percent
remains with the government: that two percent pays
the bills.
Kealey: A government should not be there
merely for what it does today. There are nine
reasons for a government: health, education,
welfare, energy, transportation, communications,
housing, food, and clothing. Defence is not
part of that: if you are not fighting anybody,
there is no need for defence. Some countries
in the world can't survive on their own because
they don't have the resources. There is nothing
in Canada that we do not have. In fact, we could
make a decision tomorrow that the critical mass
of all consumer products needed in Canada would
be made in Canada, from Canadian raw materials,
by Canadian labour: the result would be that
everybody would be employed.
Kralik: Incredible!
Kealey: We have the raw materials, the labour
force, but we don't have the plants. The raison
d'etre of the Free Trade Agreements being
concluded throughout the world is to consolidate
international control over a country by making sure
that all of the parts needed for the manufacturing
of every thing are not made in any one country.
Kralik: So that a country cannot be self-sufficient?
Kealey: The carburettors are built in one place,
the exhaust pipes in another, as are the tuners for
your VCR. All the parts have been disbursed in different
countries, all over the world. No one country can
manufacture the parts for everything produced within
their own borders. That is, with three notable
exceptions: Germany, Japan and the United States -
the European Community, the Pacific Community, and
the Atlantic Community. A One World government begins
by eliminating boundaries, ending up with three regions.
Kralik: Initially?
Kealey: Initially, and then merging them into a
One-World government under the United Nations. The
Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the US, and
Mexico is only the first step of an Agreement that
will encompass both the Americas, North and South.
Kralik: Exactly. The South American dimension was
only mentioned during the last week.
Kealey: But it has been planned all the way
through. You must remember too that the Free Trade
Deal was not a negotiation: it was transnational
bankers saying to the Governments involved:"This is
what you are going to do and here is an
implementation schedule.' Everything in the Free
Trade Deal had to fit the implementation schedule.
The final time slot is 2005.
What is being created is a United Nations in which
the rich governments send money to build a fund, the
International Monetary Fund, causing the country
from which money was sent to borrow more and more
money, thus causing more and more debt. Money is
then sent to the poor countries, creating a debt
there. So everybody is indebted to the World Bank,
the International Monetary Fund.
One branch of the Fund holds the money, the other
makes the decisions as to how it is to be used,
usually for projects that don't go anywhere: these
waste money and cause the debt to grow.
Then one day countries can't pay and the bailiff is
called. The bailiff is the United Nations Security
Council. The real assets of the world, therefore,
are re-possessed either by the bank or by the
Security Council and are put under the control
of the United Nations. Over time the resources of
each country are gathered under UN control.
The guy who was in charge of that section is
now working in Ontario as the Head of Ontario Hydro:
Maurice Strong. Would you like to know why Maurice
Strong is working in Ontario? It is because Bob Rae
[then-Premier, socialist and a Rhodes Scholar; the
current Ontario Premier, Conservative Mike Harris,
recently went on a several-day private fishing
trip at a remote camp with George Bush - just before
the Quebec "crisis" erupted in the neighbouring
province!] is in on the deal: he brought Maurice
Strong in to do what he does best.
What did Strong do first? He shut down some of the
nuclear plants. Why? Because as long as you have
nuclear plants you have too much electrical power.
If you shut them down, then you can convince people
they must dam more rivers. Make a Free Trade deal,
move the jobs out of Canada, cause unemployment,
and the people of Canada will scream: "Give us
jobs! Give us jobs!" Ultimately they will be
told: "You want a job? We've got some terrific
jobs - building dams!"
Kralik: Is that why only yesterday Chretien
signed the Free Trade deal?
Kealey: Chretien is a puppet. He is the Ronald
Reagan of Canada. Today Mitchell Sharp is the
Prime Minister of Canada. Mitchell Sharp is our
George Bush, and he was not elected. He used to
be Chretien's boss as Minister of Finance, but
today he's got his hand on the back of the puppet
[Prime Minister] Jean Chretien.
Journalists and radio-talk show hosts who would
like to interview Glen Kealey or Shelley Anne
Clark should call
THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR
POLITICAL INTEGRITY, Ottawa,
at 819-778 1705
[fax: 613-747 1644].
Grand Chief of the Quebec
Cree, Matthew Coon-Come, can be reached by
faxing 818-673 2606, or calling 613-761 1655.