From KALLISTE@delphi.comFri Nov 1 07:59:13 1996
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:12:54 -0500 (EST)
From: KALLISTE@delphi.com
To: jya@pipeline.com, jqp@globaldialog.com, tenega@aol.com,
jw-rh@ix.netcom.com, bigred@duracef.shout.net, jlavis@communique.net,
liberty@gate.net, vikbob@halcyon.com, rwb@daka.com, cato@cato.org,
akimery@citizen.infi.net, pwatson@utdallas.edu, garb@ix.netcom.com,
maddog6@flex.net, edb@interport.com, wdmann@ix.netcom.com,
germanic@netcom.com, eric@remailer.net, sandfort@crl.com,
loboazul@icsi.net, bdolan@use.usit.net, fathom9@aol.com,
defraud@tpi.net, L.L.Grabbe@theol.hull.ac.uk, JMcCorm215@aol.com,
jdtabor.uncc@uncc.campus.mci.net, zns@interserv.com, tbyfield@panix.com,
drdean@bio.win.net, rpedraza@sierra.net, kalliste@aci.net
Subject: Chuck Hayes Versus Bill Clinton II
Chuck Hayes Versus Bill Clinton II
by J. Orlin Grabbe
"Being the FBI apparently means never having to
say you are sorry."
--The Washington Times, October 30, 1996
"What do you say to a hero-turned-bombing-suspect
you carelessly and recklessly linked to the Olympic bombing
in Atlanta this summer--a man who has seen his reputation
ruined from coast to coast and dawn to dusk in newspapers,
magazines and on the airwaves, and for three months running
has been, in effect, a prisoner in his own home?
"Oops? Sorry? It was a bureaucratic snafu?
"Not if you're the FBI. In that case you say,
'Unfortunately, criminal investigations often intrude upon the
lives of private citizens like Mr. [Richard] Jewell and his
mother' " ("The Richard Jewell treatment," The Washington
Times, October 30, 1996).
It's not just that the FBI can't say they're sorry.
They're in the business of creating suspects and victims, in
adherence to a legal Say's Law: *The supply of law
enforcement creates its own demand*. FBI agents "used a
ploy to try to get Jewell to waive his constitutional right to
have a lawyer present while he was being questioned. . . . The
agents told Jewell that he was being questioned in a mock
setting in connection with a FBI training film about how to
interrogate a witness. In the course of the discussion, he was
asked to pretend to give up his rights by signing a waiver
form" ("FBI's Interview in Bombing Investigated by Justice
Dept.," The New York Times, October 30, 1996).
This is the same FBI that killed Randy Weaver's
family at Ruby Ridge. Afterward, a high-ranking official, E.
Michael Kahoe, destroyed an internal critique of the FBI's
performance in the episode.
This is the same FBI whose undercover agent made
an illegal interstate phone call from Alabama to Chuck Hayes
in Kentucky on September 10, 1996, to discuss the killing of
John Anthony Hayes, according to the affidavit of another FBI
agent (Affidavit of David R. Keller, October 22, 1996). Such
a phone call is in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1958. But being the FBI means you are allowed to
break the law. Subsequently, the Department of Justice
charged Hayes with causing this unidentified, uncover FBI
agent to use the telephone in interstate commerce in violation
of Title 18, Section 1958.
Now if I pick up the telephone and call U.S. Attorney
(and identity expert) Joseph Famularo, it is--of course--quite
clear that Joseph Famularo made me do it. "Mr. Famularo,
got anyone you would like me to kill for $100?" So there.
Can we arrest Mr. Famularo on the spot? The thug (and
identity expert) is clearly in violation of Title 18, Section 1958.
This is the same FBI that gassed and burned men,
women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound in
Waco, Texas.
Of course the FBI does face a certain problem in
Kentucky. It is not well-liked. For example, the Washington,
D.C. FBI office sent out two cars that were specially
equipped to vector in on a ground-to-satellite signal said to be
eminating from time to time from an unidentified roving truck.
One of these cars was driving down the freeway and
mysteriously caught fire. The driver of the other car went into
a restaurant and returned to find a bob cat in his vehicle. The
bobcat had ripped out the interior and electrical wiring, and
shit on the remains. (Apparently even animals don't like the
FBI in Kentucky.) While the agent peered at the bobcat
through the car window, a lady from the local humaine society
showed up and threatened to have him arrested for having a
wild animal in his car. (The bobcat, meanwhile, popped out
the back windshield and ran away into the woods.) The car
was towed away to a locked garage.
But the FBI would like to blame its problems on
Chuck Hayes. It has been gunning for Hayes for a long time.
It was Chuck Hayes who essentially ran Louis Freeh out of a
high-level intelligence meeting convened to discuss the
downing of TWA 800. The meeting was being conducted by
an explosive expert and friend of Hayes. Freeh kept
interrupting with unconstructive political statements--asserting
authority before evidence. The altercation ended with Freeh
being dragged out of the meeting.
No, Louis Freeh doesn't like Chuck Hayes. This is
the same Louis Freeh whose FBI uploaded 2045 of its files
into the White House "Big Brother" computer system, for
political use by the White House. And it was Freeh's nemesis,
Chuck Hayes, who testified about the 2045 files to a closed
and secret committee of the U.S. House of Representatives,
held without staff participation, but with an audience of eight
U.S. senators.
This is the same FBI who aided their informant Emad
Salem in constructing the bomb that blew up at the World
Trade Center in New York City on February 26, 1993
(combined report by Paul DeRienzo, Frank Morales and
Chris Flash, "Who Bombed the World Trade Center?" The
Shadow, Oct. 1994).
This is the same FBI that is an unchartered
organization--one never authorized by Congress. Thus FBI
agents are simply Justice Department employees, illegally
receiving benefits, illegally receiving pensions, and illegally
carrying weapons. And it is not a crime to lie to the
Department of Justice. If your client is in jail for lying to the
FBI, I can put you in touch with the proper attorney who has
a proven record in obtaining the release of such clients.
This is the same FBI whose head, Louis Freeh, was
terminated by the agency's payroll computer in Oklahoma on
the basis that the FBI was not a chartered organization. After
all, we all know that FBI files are secure and sacred, so the
computer could not lie, could it? But Louis Freeh seemed to
hold Chuck Hayes responsible for the incident. How could
this be so, when official court records have declared that
Chuck Hayes is computer illiterate? No, Louis Freeh must be
blaming Charles Hayes out of pure spite.
This is the same FBI that rushed to do the bidding of
the White House in the Travelgate firings, doing criminal
investigations of people who had just been unjustifiably
terminated to make room for the friends of Bill and Hillary.
This is the same FBI whose agent David R. Keller
writes as follows:
"I, David R. Keller, hereinafter referred to as Affiant,
after having been duly sworn, states as follows:
"1. That I am a Special Agent for the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI), having been so employed since July 19,
1971. . . .
"2. On or about September 6, 1996, the Affiant
learned from the FBI Office in Birmingham, Alabama, that
Charles Hayes, who resides in Nancy, Kentucky, at the
Beckett Motel, was wanting to hire a hit man to kill an
individual named John Anthony Hayes who resides in
Louisville, Kentucky.
"3. Affiant is aware that on September 10, 1996, an
Undercover Agent (UCA) of the FBI, acting in an undercover
capacity, made a recorded telephone call from the State of
Alabama to Hayes, in Nancy, Kentucky, at telephone number
[omitted].
"During this conversation, Hayes told the UCA that he
(Hayes) had been expecting a call and that the UCA may be
able to help him. Hayes stated that he need it done as soon as
possible and agreed to send the UCA a photograph of the
victim. Hayes furnished descriptive information and
background of the victim.
"4. Affiant is aware that on October 4, 1996, a letter
was received at the post office in Birmingham, Alabama, with
a return address of P.O. Box 185, Nancy, Kentucky, and
appeared to have been postmarked 9/11/96. The letter
contained a photograph of the intended victim, John Anthony
Hayes, and documents containing background information on
Hayes including John Anthony Hayes' address and the
vehicles owned by John Anthony Hayes." (Affidavit of David
R. Keller, October 22, 1996).
I find this chain of supposed events remarkable. First
of all, the FBI affirms its undercover agent violated U.S. law
by making an interstate phone call volunteering to kill
someone. Then this admittedly illegal phone call is "backed
up" by incriminating evidence that arrives via the speedy U.S.
Post Office only 23 days later--with Hayes' return address on
it!
Well, that proves everything. If the letter had Chuck
Hayes' return address on it, Chuck must have send the
documents. And I'm sure looking forward to hearing those
tape recordings containing the word "victim".
In the meantime, I hope no one sends out any
incriminating documents with David R. Keller's return address
on them. Or Joseph Famularo's.
(To Be Continued)
October 31, 1996
Web Page: http://www.aci.net/kalliste/